you will find generally three kinds of papers, thought papers, research papers, and papers that are creative. There can be elements of all three present, but papers largely belong to one of several three categories. The main focus on REL 303 may be the thought paper; no outside research is required. The main focus on REL 407 in the shorter papers is the thought paper; no outside scientific studies are required. The main focus on REL 407 into the final paper may be either a thought paper, which requires no outside research, or an investigation paper involving use of outside sources.
- a) Thought papers could make usage of materials beyond the reading that is required need not do this. Rather, the main focus is on careful study, analysis, and elaboration of ideas presented within a context that is limited such as for instance just one article or book with some support from assigned secondary readings. It is beneficial to give attention to a couple of ideas, passages, or paragraphs and think about the ramifications thereof.
- b) Research papers cope with a careful study of objective evidence accessible to support and refute arguments. You’re not needed to go to outside material, but it is often helpful to obtain supporting evidence beyond what exactly is found in the required texts to back your assertions up.
- c) Creative papers may include forms such as for example fictional narrative, personal narrative, poetry, and illustrations as a key part or all the product that is finished. You should work closely with all the instructor if you wish to do a far more creative project.
- d) You may write using one for the suggested topics, or you may formulate your own personal topic; into the latter case you will need to write a paragraph-length topic out and submit it by email to your instructor for approval.
- e) Sometimes it would likely happen that a more narrative that is personal will soon be incorporated into your writing, the one that includes personal experiences, fictional narrative, or reflections concerning the writing process. A few of the suggested paper topics will elicit styles that are different genres of writing. However, it can be more difficult to adopt alternative styles and genres. If you would like to follow different avenues of writing but they are unsure about how to repeat this, samples are offered for your perusal.
Peer review drafts may be required for some papers. Guidelines for peer review will separately be made available.
Although grading is an imprecise art, you can attain a considerable degree of consistency. As a whole, the key points are: Represent ideas fairly and accurately, raise critical questions and doubts, explore theses questions and doubts to give a sophisticated account of this ideas and issues into consideration, and write clearly. I search for listed here when papers that are reading
- a) Writing. You will think clearly and in an organized fashion if you write clearly and grammatically. If you believe clearly, this is reflected in your writing.
- b) Accuracy. Maybe you have represented the relevant ideas fairly?
- c) Focus and coverage-a balance associated with two. In the one hand, have you covered the ideas that are main to your topic? On the other side, have you been focused enough? A sense of the bigger picture should be present, but pursuing themes that are too many ideas leads to confusion.
- d) Sophistication and depth. Have you taken into account various facets of a problem or idea? You can be accurate at a level that is general”The Buddha was a seeker of truth.”), you can also be accurate at a level that is sophisticated”The Buddha was a seeker of truth who formulated his understanding with regards to the four noble truths.”). Have possible questions and objections been taken into account?
- e) Creativity. Have you been open to unexpected insights and a sense of adventure?
Even though there are no hard and fast rules, if you cover criteria a) through c), you really need to get a B. Provided you have gone that far, you could add further dimensions to your paper. I have made on your paper or your grade, please come and see me if you have any questions about comments. It is important in my situation to understand of any doubts or problems.
By studying these guidelines, i really hope that your particular learning experience shall be much more pleasurable and rewarding for both all of us. These guidelines are meant to allow you to polish an art and craft, academic writing, that you are developing as you progress. Don’t get so hung up about them which you feel your creative processes hindered. If anything, they need to provide just an adequate amount of a framework to convey your analytical and creative skills. The accompanying essay emphasizes the creative facet of paper writing.
I prefer writing. When I am totally absorbed written down, many ideas that have never occurred in my opinion before can pop up in my own mind, or once confused and fragmentary information and thought can be spontaneously organized and be clear. It is probably one of the most moments that are satisfactory me.
Yet, I often struggle for very long periods trying to organize ideas at the cruel white paper. This is especially true whenever I am trying to be systematic and logical, beginning with an overview. Since anything unclear or vague is eliminated along the way of earning an outline, the paper actually is organized, clear, and compact, but I rarely have a sense of satisfaction.
What is the difference between a paper which emerges spontaneously and something that begins with a concern for logical consistency? I have already been wondering how I can bridge the gap between both of these forms of writing and also the attitudes they represent. I have found some clues to these problems in three articles published by Donald Murray, Peter Elbow, and William Stafford.
What they emphasize in keeping is the process; writing isn’t the description of a result; in fact, writing itself can cause the effect. This implies before we begin that we should not worry too much about how the last draft will turn out, or how we can organize all of our ideas. According to Murray, what we requirement for writing is enough information and a clear purpose: logic or order can appear later in the process. Elbow even denies the need for coherence within the initial stages of producing writing. He suggests “freewriting,” which activates the writing process by getting rid of every concern about correction. Also, Stafford remarks that the most important things for his writing are receptivity and a willingness to stop standards that are high. For several of those writers, logic and organization, which includes restricted me in some ways, are secondary in the stage that over at this site is initial of. It is a fact that logical rigor is very important, but we could concern yourself with that as much as we like after everything happens to be on paper that we would you like to say.
What is important on paper is, due to the fact three writers agree, the productivity of writing. Based on Murray, for instance, writing is the process of “making something that was not there before, finding significance where others find confusion and bringing order to chaos.”By writing there is new things, which might be a new thought, a new feeling, a new idea, if not a unique self that you simply would never are finding without writing.
In order to promote this type or variety of productivity, Murray, Elbow, and Stafford agree with the necessity of opening our minds. Murray points out that writing gives us a way to capture, in the level that is conscious unconscious feelings and ideas we had not noticed or had forgotten. Elbow says freewriting is a solution to make our consciousness empty so that we are able to pick out something unconscious from deep inside our hearts. Stafford remarks that the power letting him write is not a conscious device but his “own weak, wandering, diffident impulses” along with his “confident reliance” upon these impulses.
Writing may be in comparison to a piece of cake blowing towards the window that is small consciousness and unconsciousness. The window is usually closed because consciousness is too strong to allow the window open, and another ultimately ends up surviving in only half of the house, that is, the entire world of one’s existence. Nevertheless when writing occurs with all the mind open, a breeze opens the window and another can encounter other aspects of the self, and sometimes even another self and be much more fully integrated: the sweetness for the writing process may even function as act of another self.